<$BlogRSDUrl$>

Michael/Male/26-30. Lives in United States/Pennsylvania/Wexford/Christopher Wren, speaks English. Spends 20% of daytime online. Uses a Fast (128k-512k) connection. And likes baseball /politics.
This is my blogchalk:
United States, Pennsylvania, Wexford, Christopher Wren, English, Michael, Male, 26-30, baseball , politics.

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Phillies Season Preview 2008: Batting 

The Phillies 2008 season kicks off next Monday with Brett Myers taking the mound at 3:05 PM against the Washington Nationals in Citizens Bank Ballpark. I thought that I might give my two cents about this season and how it is going to unfold. If you’ve read my predictions for the National League you’ll know that I am projecting the Phillies to finish second in the N.L. East, edging out the Mets, but finishing behind the Braves and that the Phillies will flame out in the first round against the Diamondbacks. I’ve gotten a very negative reaction from Mets fans …

This will be an interesting season to watch: will the Phillies build on their division title in 2007? Or will last season prove to be a fluke? This will be an important year for the team, but not pivotal. The ’08 Phillies are a young team and will contend in 2009, in 2010 and 2011. The future is bright. Brighter, certainly, then the aging Mets.

The ’08 Phillies look like a team that will win 88-93 or so games, which will put them into the mix for the post-season. The D-Backs boasted the best record in the N.L. last season and that was just 90-72, only a game better than the Phillies. Even with Johan Santana hurling fastballs for the Mets the Phillies have a very good opportunity to make the playoffs this season. With the core of their ’08 team returning, the Phillies remain the team to beat in the N.L. East. Let’s start with the bats:

First off, here are some terms so that you are not totally confused about what I’m talking about. Isolated Power (ISO): .SLG - .BA = .ISO. Measures a player’s raw power by subtracting singles from their slugging percentage. On-Base Percentage (OBP): How often a player gets on base. (H + BB + HBP) / (Plate Appearances). Walks per plate appearance (BB/PA): BB / PA = .BB/PA Avg. Slugging Percentage (SLG): Total Bases / At-Bats = Slugging Percentage. Power at the plate. Runs Created (RC): A stat originally created by Bill James to measure a player’s total contribution to his team’s lineup. Here is the formula: [(H + BB + HBP - CS - GIDP) times ((S * 1.125) + (D * 1.69) + (T * 3.02) + (HR * 3.73) + (.29 * (BB + HBP – IBB)) + (.492 * (SB + SF + SH)) – (.04 * K))] divided by (AB + BB + HBP + SH+ SF). RC/27: Runs Created per 27 outs, essentially what a team of 9 of this player would score in a hypothetical game.

Ordinarily I like to post a massive piece taking everything together, but I’ve found myself deluged at work and desperately trying to finish this project. I’m going to post my thoughts on batting first, then try and finish pitching and fielding later this week. Back to the Phillies …

The 2008 Phillies will have no problem scoring runs. The Phillies 892 runs scored in 2007 led the National league by a margin of 32 over the Colorado Rockies. The Phillies also led the N.L. in On-Base Percentage (.354), in Slugging Percentage (.458), and in triples (41). They finished second in home runs (213), in stolen bases (138). The Phillies lineup is only slightly changed from last season. Gone is Centerfielder Aaron Rowand and his surprisingly productive bat. Rowand hit 27 Home Runs, 45 Doubles, 89 RBI and scored 105 runs in 2007. His 100 Runs Created were a career high for Rowand, a talented hitter who doesn’t draw walks much (just 18 in 2006, 47 last season) and tends to see inconsistent results. In his place the Phillies intend to shift Shane Victorino over the centerfield (more on that later), and platoon Jayson Werth and Geoff Jenkins in rightfield. Werth and Jenkins will slide into Rowand’s slot and platoon as the #6 hitter. Pedro Feliz replaces the ineffectual trio of Wes Helms, Abraham Nunez and Greg Dobbs as the Phillies everyday third baseman, while Carlos Ruiz takes the reins as the regular catcher, a job he’s had off-and-on for the last two seasons.

Probable Lineup:
SS – Jimmy Rollins
CF – Shane Victorino
2B – Chase Utley
1B – Ryan Howard
LF – Pat Burrell
RF – Jayson Werth / Geoff Jenkins
3B – Pedro Feliz
C – Carlos Ruiz
P – Pitcher

Jimmy Rollins, the 2007 N.L. MVP, leads off for the Phillies in 2008. Rollins was spectacular in 2007, posting a career-high 124 Runs Created, and leading the league in triples for the fourth time in his career. Rollins batted .296 (.345 OBP), hit 30 home runs, 20 triples, 38 doubles, scored 139 runs, batted in 94, and stole 41 of the 47 bases he tried to steal. Simply put, Rollins was the catalyst for the Phillies N.L.-best offense. When Rollins first joined the Phillies he was primarily there for his speed. In his first season he stole 46 bases in 54 tries. Rollins still retained his speed: his 20 triples was a career high, and the 41 steals were fifth-best in the N.L. Rollins is also a superb baserunner: he didn’t make a single baserunning out last season and gained an extra 32 bases with his savvy running, according to the 2008 Bill James Handbook … 2007 was the culmination of a long maturation in Rollins game that began in 2004 when he underwent the tutelage of Tony Gwynn, the legendary contact hitter, prior to the 2004 season. After striking out 108, 103 and 113 times during his first three MLB seasons, Rollins has lowered that to 73, 71, 80 and 85 in ‘07, becoming a much better contact hitter. In addition to making contact, Rollins has also refined his power stroke. Prior to 2006, Rollins career-high for home runs had been 14. He hit 25 in 2006 and 30 last season, major increases in his raw power at the plate:

ISO:
2001: .145
2002: .135
2003: .124
2004: .166
2005: .141
2006: .201
2007: .235

Having a guy at the top of the order with so much speed and power at the plate is a rare combination and remind many of Rickey Henderson when he helped the Oakland A’s and Toronto Blue Jays to World Series titles in 1989 and 1993 respectively … as an aside, Rickey Henderson’s MVP campaign in 1990 – 28 home runs, 119 runs scored, 65 steals in 75 tries, a .439 OBP – compares very much to J.Roll’s ’07 campaign … Much was made about the fact that Rollins led the N.L. in outs last year with 527, but much less was made over the fact that Rollins also led the N.L. in plate appearances with 778. Rollins gained nearly as many bases as MVP-runner up Matt Holliday (386 to 380), and played a more-challenging defensive position well. Holliday also plays in a much more offensive-friendly park … Without Rollins exceptional production, the Phillies would have been sunk in 2007. How will J.Roll perform in 2008? Well, the 2008 Bill James Handbook projects a decline for Jimmy Rollins in 2008: 21 Home Runs, 10 triples, 41 doubles, 120 runs scored, 76 RBI, .339 OBP, 35 steals in 45 tries, and 108 Runs Created. No doubt that Rollins won’t quite achieve what he did last season, but I think he’ll hit more like 12-15 triples, and 22-25 home runs. He’ll still be a major threat and a major reason why the Phillies are a playoff contender … Next is Shane Victorino, a talent the Phillies stole from the San Diego Padres in the Rule 5 Draft in 2004. After playing most of the season in a part-time role in ‘06 (injuries to Aaron Rowand got him into centerfield for some time, then Victorino got some playing time after Bobby Abreu was dealt to the Yankees), Victorino got to become the Phillies everyday rightfielder in 2007 but missed about a month of the season with injuries. The Flyin’ Hawaiian (Victorino grew up on Maui) is a superb defensive outfielder (more on that later) and a speed demon. Victorino hit eight triples in 2006, a taste for the Phillies of what he would accomplish in 2007. Victorino hit another three triples and stole 37 of the 41 bases he tried to steal. Victorino does have to become a smarter player on the basepaths, however: he made four baserunning outs in 2007 and gained just seven extra bases with his running. Victorino also doesn’t have Rollins power at the plate: he hit just twelve home runs in 2007. His isolated power at the plate was just .142. He gives the Phillies exactly what they need in the two slot: a fast guy who gets on base (.347 OBP) and has a little power. The 2008 Bill James Handbook, by the way, projects Victorino to pretty much repeat his performance last season: 20 doubles, 5 triples, 12 home runs, 25 steals in 32 tries, a .336 OBP and 64 Runs Created … Consistency thy name is Chase Utley. I have a feeling that I’ll be writing a lot about Mr. Utley in the coming weeks for the 2008 season because he is my odds-on favorite to be the Phillies candidate for the MVP award, and if the Phillies are in the 2008 playoff hunt, he WILL be one of the top candidates. Had Utley not have missed a month of the season last year with a broken hand I think he might have actually beaten J.Roll out for the award. Chase Utley is a nearly perfect player: he’s a power hitter with speed who gets on base, hits well in the clutch and is the best fielder at a challenging defensive position. Last season Utley was third in the N.L. in batting average (.332), fifth in On-Base Percentage (.410), seventh in slugging percentage (.566), first in Hit By Pitches (25), first in Runs Created per 27 Outs (8.1), and he finished third in doubles (48, but he almost certainly would have bested Matt Holiday’s 50 had he not been injured). Simply put, Utley’s MVP candidacy died when he lost a month of the season after being hit by a pitch on July 26th against the Nationals. Had he not he probably would have edged Rollins out based on the fact that Utley’s adjusted OPS was better than his – 145 to 118 – and was even better than Ryan Howard’s 144 … Since taking the second base job in 2005 when Placido Polanco was dealt to the Tigers, Utley has been astonishingly consistent. Look at his three-year totals for Home Runs (28, 32, 22), for Doubles (39, 40, 48), for RBI (105, 102, 103) and OBP (.376, .379, .410). When the stakes are high Utley shines. Look at Utley’s BA/RISP:

2005: .309
2006: .308
2007: .304

I think 2008 will be Utley’s season to shine. He consistently plays a tough defensive position well, hits for power and average and runs the bases well. If Utley manages the feat he’d be the third Phillie to win the MVP award in three years, feat a trio of teammates haven’t done in the National League since Mort Cooper, Stan Musial and Marty Marion did it in ’42 – ’44 … I should note that Roger Maris, Mickey Mantle and Elston Howard did it from ’61 – ’63 in the American League … I think Utley’s chances are good … Here’s a fun fact: in 2007 Chase Utley finished eighth in OPS (On-Base Percentage plus Slugging Percentage) in the National League against sliders (1.086), against changeups (1.067), and against fastballs (.977). That’s consistency … Well, we’ve discussed one MVP and a potential MVP, so let’s discuss the other MVP on the Phillies roster: Ryan Howard. The $10 Million dollar man had failed to add an award to his mantle for the first time last season after being named the 2005 Rookie of the Year and 2006 National League MVP, but he still powered the Phillies with 47 home runs and 136 RBI. Off to a terrific start this spring it will be interesting to see if the Phillies and Howard can kiss and make up, or is the split between the two irreconcilable? If Howard were to flee the Phillies as a free agent and leave for Los Angeles or New York, the calamity the Phillies would be faced with would be awful. In the here and now, Howard powers the Phillies attack with his big bat. Last season Howard was second in the N.L. in home runs (three behind Prince Fielder), second in RBI (one behind Matt Holliday), fourth in walks (107), fifth in slugging percentage (.584), and first in strikeouts … In the last three seasons Ryan Howard has struck out 380 times in 1,700 plate appearances, meaning that he strikes-out 28.2% of the time. I personally think the strikeout is over-rated. An out is an out is an out. What is the big deal if the scorers card reads “K” or “F-7”? Arguably a strikeout is better than a walk: it takes a minimum of three pitches but usually five or six to actually strikeout. A pop-fly could be one pitch or two. What’s better: an out that uses up the pitchers arm? Or a quick out on a contact play? I’ll take the strikeout. The criticism that Howard strikes out too much is nonsense, I believe. Howard’s 4.20 pitches per plate appearance were third-best in the N.L. after Pat Burrell and Todd Helton … Howard plays a vital role in the Phillies offense because he ability to bash the 400-foot home run clears the bases and gives the Phillies the big innings that power them to 7-4 victories. I look for Howard to top 50+ home runs again this season and to hit 140-150 RBI. Is a second MVP award out of reach? Not really. Ryan Howard has the ability to build on his MVP campaign in 2006 with an even better one in 2008. He also has, according to the 2008 Bill James Handbook, an 11% chance of hitting 700 or home runs, which means that he could challenge Barry Bonds 762 home runs one day in the future. At 129 in just two and a half MLB seasons, he’s well on his way … Pat Burrell enters the sixth and final year of a deal that he signed in the wake of his spectacular 2002 season, when he seemed to step into Scott Rolen’s shoes and become the focal point of the franchise. Burrell hit 37 home runs, 39 doubles and 116 RBI with a .376 OBP that season, a real breakthrough for the first overall pick in the 1998 Draft, and numbers that seemed to cement the powerful, athletic Burrell as the face of the franchise. He was going to do what Scott Rolen couldn’t or wouldn’t: become the greatest Phillie since Mike Schmidt. With the announcement that the Phillies had acquired Jim Thome heading into the ’03 season, the sky seemed the limit for Burrell. Schmidt, as I recall, predicted the duo would hit 100+ home runs together … Instead, Burrell’s horrific 2003 campaign, where he hit just 21 home runs and 64 RBI, and saw his adjusted OPS fall from 146 to 90, destroyed his promising future … Burrell’s Win Shares plunged from 25 to 9 … It was a terrible decline for a player who had once seemed like the next superstar on a team that hadn’t had one in twenty years. He spent nearly all season in 2004 regaining his stroke. Burrell’s OBP rebounded to .365, but his raw power at the plate remained flat: .195 ISO in 2003, .198 ISO in 2004. Burrell had 117 RBI in 2005, a career-high, but his production wasn’t quite the same. He still put up great numbers in ’05 – ’07, but he became a different player statistically – more of an OBP threat, more of a defensive liability – and the trauma of ’03 – ’04 remained in the minds of Phillies fans ... The shame of it is that while Pat Burrell isn’t the same player that he was in 2002, he’s a critical cog in the Phillies offense. In 2007 Pat Burrell hit 30 home runs, had 97 RBI, drew a whopping 114 walks and posted an OBP of .400 … Burrell was third in the N.L. in walks and ninth in On-Base Percentage. His 4.22 pitches per plate appearance were second to just the Rockies Todd Helton at 4.36. Burrell is no-longer an aggressive free-swinger at the plate. He’s a cautious, meticulous player. Unfortunately people buy into the image of the swaggering free swinger, so Burrell’s contributions go entirely unnoticed. The fact that he takes 63.8% of the pitches he sees – fourth in the N.L. – means that Burrell isn’t up there hacking away heroically. Interestingly, 40% of Burrell’s plate appearances ended in walks or strikeouts: outcomes where the ball was never put into play. The fact that he is often removed for a defensive substitution now is another blow to his image as the swaggering heir to Mike Schmidt. The fact is that after Ryan Howard, Burrell might be the most powerful bat the Phillies have in their lineup:

HR/AB:
Howard: 11.3
Burrell: 15.7
Rollins: 23.9
Utley: 24.9

After Howard, whose bat moves runners off the bases more efficiently? No, Phillies fans don’t trust Pat Burrell because he isn’t the heroic leader of the team anymore. Nobody who draws a walk 20% of the time he goes to the plate can be a leader, can he? … What can Burrell do in 2008? I see another 110-120 walk season with 30-35 home runs, 95-105 RBI and little respect in store for Burrell this season. I also think he’ll get off to a nice start too, because his OPS in the second half of the season last years was 1.010, seventh-best in the N.L. … The Phillies plan to platoon Jayson Weth and Geoff Jenkins in rightfield in 2008. Werth, the former Dodger, joined the Phillies last season enjoyed impressive success as the Phillies fourth outfielder, hitting 8 home runs with 49 RBI and 43 runs scored in limited action (just 304 plate appearances). Werth’s 55 Runs Created in 183 Outs meant that Werth had 8.11 Runs Created per 27 Outs, one of the best percentages in all of baseball, had he earned enough plate appearances to qualify. What was impressive about Werth’s performance was how he consistently got hits when he put the ball into play (.386 BA/BIP), worked counts to draw walks (.145 walks per plate appearance, which helped his OBP to a staggering .404) and the fact that he didn’t ground into a single double play last season. That’s right. Not a one. Zip. Zero. Zilch. Werth also hit an astonishing .379 with runners in scoring position. Naturally, I don’t expect Werth to entirely replicate his impressive .298 batting average in 2008, but his OBP ought to be in that .360 - .370 range again. Not just an OBP machine, Werth has impressive skill at the plate in terms of power: his 22 extra-base hits might not sound impressive, but given his limited action they were impressive. Werth;s Isolated Power at the plate was an impressive .161 … Jenkins, a left-handed hitter, will join the right-handed Werth in the outfield platoon. Geoff Jenkins was a long-time member of the Milwaukee Brewers and no longer fit into their plans. Might Jenkins acquisition, like Werth’s and Greg Dobbs and Chris Coste’s and David Dellucci’s, be another savvy move made by the Phillies high-command to rescue a seemingly washed up player from the slag heap and find a useful role? Jenkins isn’t the solid get-on-base with some power guy that Werth is. Jenkins is a slugger: his 32 walks in 464 plate appearances gave him an average .069 BB/PA. Jenkins hit 21 home runs and 24 doubles for the Brewers and posted a .216 isolated power last season. I hope, in comparing Werth and Jenkins, that the Phillies give more playing time to Werth and utilize Jenkins in later innings as a pinch-hitter when his capacity to stroke 400-foot home runs might be more useful. Jenkins and Werth give the Phillies a flexible platoon to replace Rowand, who used to hit in the sixth slot. I know there was much hand-wringing from Phillies fans over Rowand’s departure in the off-season, but it is silly. The Phillies could never have offered Rowand the money that the Giants, so desperate to move out of the Barry Bonds era, could have. Inking Rowand, an over-rated defensive outfielder who enjoyed a career year at the plate last season to a long-term deal would have been foolish. Check out the numbers the Bill James Handbook projects Jenkins, Werth and Rowand to post this season:

Runs Created / 27 Outs (Projected):
Jayson Werth: 6.12
Aaron Rowand: 5.63
Geoff Jenkins: 5.29

Rowand was a free-swinger who surprised everyone with an impressive .345 BA/BIP last season. Werth, and to a lesser-extent Jenkins, are savvier hitters at the plate than Rowand. Hard as it may be for Phillies fans to accept, the Phillies will hit better with Werth and Jenkins than Rowand … Moving along to the seventh slot in the Phillies lineup we encounter Pedro Feliz. The Phillies got awful production out of their third basemen in 2007, a sad fact for a team that featured the greatest third baseman of all-time just a quarter century ago. Greg Dobbs, Wes Helms and Abraham Nunez all played significant time and all, to varying degrees, failed to deliver consistent production. Helms, acquired from the Florida Marlins, was a flop, hitting .198 with runners in scoring position, just 24 extra-base hits (and just five of those were home runs), a horrible .297 OBP and an OPS+ of 88. Nunez had an OBP of .318 and an OPS of 79. Dobbs hit better last season (see below) but remains more of a pinch-hitter type of player than an every day player. The Phillies hope all of that changes with Feliz, a former San Francisco Giant. I’m frankly not impressed by the move, despite Feliz’s hot start in spring training. Perhaps Feliz will post better numbers playing in a cozy park like Citizens Bank, but some of the numbers suggest that Feliz will have issues. Let’s start with the fact that Feliz has had a sub-.300 OBP each of the last three seasons: .290 in ’07, .282 in ’06, and .295 in ’05. So the Phillies didn’t acquire Feliz for his capacity to get on base – his .049 BB/PA was the third-worst in the National League last season – can Feliz hit the ball? Well, Feliz has hit 84 home runs over the last four seasons, but that isn’t that impressive in this modern age. Disturbingly, Feliz’s isolated power has been on a trend downwards: .209 in 2004, .172 in 2005, .184 in 2006, and .165 last season. Feliz hit well with runners in scoring position last season – .310 – but in every other respect, his performance last season ought not to fill Phillies fans with hope. It should fill them with dread … Finally we get down to the catchers slot. With Rod Barajas gone the catchers slot firmly belongs to Carlos Ruiz. After being over-shadowed by Chris Coste, the thirty-something minor-leaguer (whose book I am busy reading and will shortly post a review of) who burst onto the scene in 2006, Ruiz got a lot of playing time last year and made the most of it. He hit just six home runs, but hit an impressive 29 doubles and two triples in 429 plate appearances. Surprisingly for a catcher, he was successful in six of his seven stolen base attempts. Ruiz displayed a good eye at the plate, drawing 42 walks against 49 strikeouts. His .280 batting average with runners in scoring position was pretty good. The only real surprise when looking at Ruiz’s stats was that he grounded into 17 double plays, an awfully high percentage for a guy who doesn’t play more than 70-80% of the time … That’s the Phillies starting lineup, a fearsome collection of bats that will score 850-to-900 runs next season. Here is what the Phillies bench will probably look like:

Bench:
OF – So Taguchi
IF/ OF – Greg Dobbs
IF – Wes Helms
IF – Eric Buntlett
IF / C- Chris Coste

Of the Phillies bench players, the first bat off the bench (after Jenkins or Werth) will be Greg Dobbs, who hit ten home runs and 55 RBI in 2007 in very limited action. Dobbs, who never got to play much in Seattle, finally got a chance to show what he can do. The Phillies like Dobbs a lot because he can play first base, he can play third, and he can play in the outfield. He’s the sort of versatile guy you want on your team … Chris Coste is a great story – give me a few days and I’ll finally get finished typing my review of his book, The 33-Year old Rookie – a career Minor Leaguer who jumped around in the Red Sox, Pirates and Indians systems before finding his way to Philadelphia in 2006. Pressed into duty with the injuries to Mike Lieberthal and Sal Fasano, Coste stunned observers by hitting .328 (.376 OBP) along with 7 home runs and 32 RBI in just 213 plate appearances. Coste played more sparingly in 2007, getting about 80 fewer turns at the plate and hitting .279. Coste’s OPS fell from .881 to .730 last season. The only thing I don’t like about Coste is his refusal to draw walks. He drew just four last season in 137 plate appearances and ten in 213 in 2006. Usually, I think an inability to draw walks is fatal to a player’s performance, but I still like seeing Chris Coste’s #27 on the Phillies roster. His defense improved last year (more on that later) and he became a more rounded player. He seems fated to be the Phillies backup catcher and a dangerous bat off the bench … Eric Bruntlett was a throw-in piece to the Brad Lidge deal and he seems fated to play the role of the new Abraham Nunez: the light-hitting defensive player you never want to see holding a bat at the plate in the bottom of the ninth. Bruntlett played sparingly with the Astros over the last few years and when he did he contributed little to the team’s offense. Bruntlett’s OPS for the last several years has been .705 in 2005, .695 in 2006, and .629 last season … So Taguchi joins the Phillies after spending the last several years with the St. Louis Cardinals as their reserve outfielder / pinch-hitter / pinch-runner. Taguchi is this year’s Michael Bourn, the speedy outfielder who stole 18 of 19 bases in a largely pinch-runner / defensive replacement role in 2007 for the Phillies. Taguchi has hit just 19 home runs in his MLB career, but has stolen 36 of 48 bases. Disturbingly, in exceedingly limited play last year Taguchi grounded into ten double plays … Securing the Phillies final roster slot will be Wes Helms. Based on comments from General Manager Pat Gillick the Phillies seem likely to bring 14 position players and 11 pitchers north with them, but the Phillies might go with 12 pitchers and 13 position players if they feel that they need a deeper bullpen. If they go with 12 pitchers then Helms won’t have a job anymore. (That’s good news for Clay Condrey, who seems likely to make the team only if Helms doesn’t.) I personally would prefer to see Condrey make the team over Helms. Helms was awful in 2007, hitting just five home runs and 39 RBI (and 24 Runs Created). The Phillies brought him onto the team after his strong part-time performance with the Marlins in 2006, when he posted a .390 OBP and 45 Runs Created in just 240 At-Bats. Helms OBP collapsed almost 100 points to .297 last year and he didn’t hit for power at all. The consequence was the Phillies had a light-hitting power hitter who grounded into a lot of double plays: ten. Perhaps 2007 was a fluke, but I am skeptical. Helms will have to do a lot better in ’08 to justify a roster spot, especially since the Phillies have a third baseman – Pedro Feliz – and a capable backup – Greg Dobbs – already.

What kind of a performance will the Phillies turn in this season? I’m going to project them to hit about 200 home runs, to steal 100-110 bases, to hit 320-330 doubles, and to score 900 runs. Ryan Howard will top 50 home runs and Chase Utley will make a powerful statement to MVP voters with an OBP over .400, a .300+ Batting Average, 110 RBI, 25 or so Home Runs, and 50 Doubles. If you are looking for a player to surprise you, I’d take a look at Shane Victorino. I think he’ll improve his OBP this season and will steal 45 to 50 bases, as well as hit 7 to 10 triples.

So those are the hitters. I ought to post the pitchers on Thursday and the Fielders on Friday or Saturday. No guarantees.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


(4) comments

Monday, March 03, 2008

Spring Baseball 

Spring Training is under way and the Phillies are 2-2 with a 7-7 tie with the Yankees thrown into the mix. Here are some preliminary observations …

Pitching … Thus far the Phillies team ERA sits at a hefty 6.25. The team has tossed 36 innings and surrendered 25 earned runs (I’m not including the numbers from yesterday’s tie in the mix). They’ve surrendered 2.00 home runs per nine innings, 4.50 walks per nine innings and 6.50 strikeouts per nine innings and have a 1.44 strikeout-to-walk ratio. Two pitching performances have stood out as being outstanding:

Jamie Moyer, the ageless wonder, hurled three innings on the first day of spring training and surrendered just one hit, didn’t allow a run, a home run or a walk and struck-out three hitters. Not bad.

Travis Blackley, the Phillies Rule 5 Draftee fighting for a roster spot, tossed three shut-out innings as well, allowing just on hit, no walks or home runs, and struck-out two hitters. This performance thus far strongly suggests that Blackley is in the running to make the Phillies Opening Day roster and stay with the team in 2008.

Carlos Carrasco, the Phillies highly-touted rookie, tossed three innings and struck-out three, allowing just three hits and no runs against the Yankees. Nice job.

Performances that ought to worry Phillies fans … Temporary closer Tom Gordon has pitched two-thirds of an inning and allowed two runs on two hits and a walk … In two innings of work, Adam Eaton surrendered five hits (one a home run) and two runs.

As yet there isn’t a whole lot of data to extract positive clues from, but the preliminary outcomes suggest that the Phillies pitching is going to have some weak points.

Over on the offensive side, many Phillies hitters are off to big starts. Carlos Ruiz is hitting .667 on four-of-six at the plate with two doubles and an RBI. Pedro Feliz is hitting .571 on four-of-seven hitting with two doubles and an RBI. Ryan Howard is four-for-ten with two doubles and a home run and three RBI, while Chase Utley is three-for-eight with three doubles and two RBI.

Some Phillies are struggling – Pat Burrell is one-for-six and Jimmy Rollins is one-for-seven – but these are traditionally slow-starting hitters. Wes Helms – zero-for-six – has lost his position as the third baseman and won’t mount much of an argument to reclaim it with this spring performance.

Quick Eagles discussion … The Birds have made some nice moves in free agency, inking Chris Clemons and Assante Samuel to deals to strengthen the defensive unit. Samuel is a real shut-down corner who will strengthen the Eagles pass-rush by locking down wideouts. I hope the Eagles resist the temptation to deal Lito Shepard and keep him and Sheldon Brown to play next to Samuel. Having three Pro Bowl quality cornerbacks can’t hurt in a division where you play Plaxico Burress and T.O., can it? Clemons is a little under-sized and may not be able to fight through the rigors on the NFL regular season as a starter, but the team seemed committed to a rotation-style strategy on the defensive line … I’ve been very impressed by the splash that the Cleveland Browns have made this off-season, keeping Derek Anderson and Jamal Lewis, their quarterback and running back respectively, and acquiring game-breaking wideout Donte Stallworth, the former Eagle. The Eagles – Browns game this year is going to be a big, big battle.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,


(2) comments

Thursday, January 31, 2008

Pedro Feliz 

Ask any real baseball fan who is the greatest third baseman of all-time is and they’ll name a Phillie: Mike Schmidt. This is an important position on the field symbolically for the Phillies and the recent history the position has for the team is sad: Scott Rolen was supposed to be Schmidt’s heir as the face of the team, and he was exceptionally talented at the plate and in the field, but his attitude and feuds got him shipped westward to St. Louis, and, more recently, to the frozen north of Canada.

The Phillies signed David Bell in 2003 to fill the void, but Bell was a disaster offensively at the plate (though a superstar with his glove). In 2007 the team wanted to turn over a new leaf, but they didn't get it.

Simply put, the Phillies are getting awful production from their third baseman and the problems reached a nadir here in the Post-Scott Rolen, Post-David Bell era.

Wes Helms. Abraham Nunez. Greg Dobbs. Russell Branyan. These were the faces the Phillies tried to utilize to fill the void Bell and Rolen’s departures have caused. How well did they do? No team in baseball, aside from maybe the Pittsburgh Pirates, got worse production from their third basemen.

While division rivals Marlins (i.e. Miguel Cabrera), the Mets (i.e., David Wright) and the Braves (i.e. Chipper Jones) ranked #1, #2 and #3 respectively in OPS for third basemen in 2007, the Phillies ranked sixteenth of sixteen teams:

NL East 3B OPS: (rank)
Marlins: .956 (1st)
Mets: .951 (2nd)
Braves: .944 (3rd)
Nationals: .794 (7th)
Phillies: .688 (16th)

The Phillies 3B’s also ranked sixteenth in runs scored, fourteenth in RBIs, fifteenth in home runs and sixteenth in extra-base hits. They did well in an area where nobody wants to do well: the Phillies 3B’s ranked third in grounding into double plays. Helms, for example, hit .246 (.297 OBP), with just five home runs and thirty-nine RBI, while grounding into ten double plays. Here comes Pedro Feliz, who signed a two-year deal worth a little over $8 mil to play for the Phillies. The right-handed hitting Feliz had an OPS of just .708 in 2007. The problem with Feliz’s game is that he’s a free-swinger who doesn’t bother to work counts. He saw just 3.3 pitches per plate appearance in 2007. It shows in his OBP, which has been below .300 for the last three seasons:

OBP:
2004: .305
2005: .295
2006: .282
2007: .290

Confused about what I’m talking about? Here are the stats I refer to defined:
Isolated Power (ISO): .SLG - .BA = .ISO. Measures a player’s raw power by subtracting singles from their slugging percentage.
On-Base Percentage (OBP): How often a player gets on base. (H + BB + HBP) / (Plate Appearances)
Slugging Percentage (SLG): Total Bases / At-Bats = Slugging Percentage. Power at the plate.
Runs Created (RC): A stat originally created by Bill James to measure a player’s total contribution to his team’s lineup. Here is the formula: [(H + BB + HBP - CS - GIDP) times ((S * 1.125) + (D * 1.69) + (T * 3.02) + (HR * 3.73) + (.29 * (BB + HBP – IBB)) + (.492 * (SB + SF + SH)) – (.04 * K))] divided by (AB + BB + HBP + SH+ SF).
RC/27: Runs Created per 27 outs, essentially what a team of 9 of this player would score in a hypothetical game.

This is, simply put, awful. Wes Helms, who flopped at third base after the Phillies signed him from the Marlins, posted a better OBP … The no-hitting Abraham Nunez had a better OBP too: .318 … What Feliz brings to the table that Nunez and, to a lesser extent Helms and Dobbs lack, is power. Not a lot of power, mind you, but more than what the Phillies have been seeing from their third basemen. Feliz’s isolated power at the plate (ISO) was .165 in 2007. The Phillies 3B’s had an ISO of .113, so unquestionably Feliz would be an upgrade, if his 2004-2007 performances hold steady. He’s a consistent 30+ double / 20+ home run hitter.

According to the 2008 Bill James Handbook, Feliz will hit 18 home runs and 70 RBI for the Phillies in 2008. Feliz will have 59 Runs Created, which is basically what he’s done for the last several seasons, or 4.26 Runs Created per 27 Outs. These aren’t great numbers, and would make Feliz one of the Phillies weakest offensive performers, but they are better than those Wes Helms or Abraham Nunez would have given the Phillies in 2008. For the record, Helms projects at 5.02 and Nunez at 3.17.

So the bottom-line is that I'm not impressed by Feliz's skills. Why am I not unhappy with the Phillies decision to sign him? Well, given that Feliz will be hitting #7 or #8 in the lineup, Feliz's ability to draw walks and get on base isn't all that important. Drawing a walk with two outs and the pitcher on-deck is tantamont to gauranteeing that J.Roll will lead-off the next inning. It isn't setting up Cole Hamels for an RBI situation. Down in the lower spots of the lineup you need someone with a little pop to their bat to sting the opposition with a solo-shot home run, because you aren't really setting your team up for the big inning when the pitcher is going to bat. Feliz's ability to slug the ball is superior to that of Helms and Nunez, so this is a signing that makes a lot of sense. If he hits a few more solo home runs than Nunez & Helms, his presence will help the Phillies offense. I think Feliz will hit 25-to-30 home runs in 2008. He may only have 65-70 RBI, but he'll sting the opposition with a few late home runs and that might help the Phillies here and there.

Welcome to Philly, Pedro Feliz.

Labels: , , , ,


(9) comments

Thursday, December 27, 2007

On Hitting: The Season in Review, 2007 

You can’t win baseball games without scoring runs. That’s about as simple a statement about baseball that you will ever hear. And the truest. Great baseball teams need to be balanced at every phase of the game, from hitting to pitching to fielding. Teams that attempt to rely solely on their pitchers and defense will inevitably fail because you cannot hope to eke out 1-0 victories in the modern game of baseball.

The subject of hitting probably the most tilled field in the baseball world. Fielding is baseball’s newest frontier and pitching, thanks to people like Voros McCracken, has recently been the subject of much discussion and analysis. The offensive aspect of the game has long been discussed and analyzed, so we have many metrics and tools to utilize in this discussion. While sabremetrics began with Bill James questioning the error and fielding percentage, fielding stats, in his original Baseball Abstract, it is in the realm of hitting that he made his first real splash when he conceived of the statistic of Runs Created (RC) as a tool to measure individual performance.

Many of the readers of this blog are keenly aware of RC and know the history behind it, but I’ll give a little primer on some of the stats we’ll be talking about:

Runs Created was developed by James to combat the problem of evaluating players performance without relying on what their teammates do. Runs scored, for example, is flawed because it relies on the guy hitting behind you. He has to bat you in. Runs Batted In (RBI), which was championed by newspaperman Ernie Lanigan in the early 1900’s and only became an official stat of the N.L. and A.L. in 1920, relies on players getting on base ahead of you. Easy to rip 100 RBIs if the guys playing in front of you are named Derek Jeter Alex Rodriguez and Gary Sheffield. The solution was to look at what you did to give your teammates chances to score by getting on base (A Factor) what you did to advance runners (B Factor), and how many chances you had (C Factor). Here is the modern formula:

A= (H + BB + HBP - CS - GIDP)
B= (S * 1.125) + (D * 1.69) + (T * 3.02) + (HR * 3.73) + (.29 * (BB + HBP – IBB)) + (.492 * (SB + SF + SH)) – (.04 * K)
C= (AB + BB + HBP + SH+ SF).

(A * B) / C

The original formula proposed by James in his third Baseball Abstract in 1979, looked like this: ((Hits + Walks) * (Total Bases)) / (At Bats + Walks)

James most recently created the modern formula in 2004 to account for the complexities in the modern game.

After Runs Created there are a passel of stats we’ll look at, ranging from Isolated Power (ISO): .SLG - .BA = .ISO., a stat which measures a player’s raw power by subtracting singles from their slugging percentage, to Slugging Percentage (SLG): Total Bases / At-Bats = Slugging Percentage, which measures overall power at the plate, to On-Base Percentage (OBP): How often a player gets on base. (H + BB + HBP) / (Plate Appearances), which is a stat that ousted Batting Average as a measure of a player’s ability thanks to the Oakland A’s realization during the 1980’s that since a walk was just as good, if not better, than a single, than any system that didn’t take the walk into account was flawed. I talked a little about this the other day in discussing fielding. Eric Walker’s The Sinister First Baseman, a collection of essays on baseball that Oakland A’s General Manager Sandy Alderson read in the early 1980’s and whose conclusions Alderson incorporated into the A’s baseball philosophy, is the key intellectual author of OBP. As Walker notes in his book, the most precious thing that a team has in baseball is it’s three outs each inning and their twenty-seven in a game. Once you waste those, they are gone forever, so Thou Shalt Not Waste Outs is the creed of the Moneyball movement.

Alright, with all of that theory behind us, let’s move on to the Phillies.

So how did the Phillies offense function? Very well. For the second consecutive season, the Phillies offense ranked first in the National League with runs scored, scoring 892, 32 more than the Colorado Rockies and 82 more than the Atlanta Braves. The Phillies 892 runs would have actually ranked them second in the American League, where scoring is always higher because of the designated hitter. The Yankees led the A.L. in runs scored with 968, but the Phillies hit more home runs than they did (213 vs. 201) and stole more bases (138 vs. 123). The Phillies 892 runs scored are the most in the N.L. since the Braves scored 907 runs in 2003.

The Phillies were the offensive juggernaut they were because they packed power at the plate, they got on base, and they were fast.

In addition to ranking first in runs scored, the Phillies ranked second in home runs with 213 (18 fewer than the Milwaukee Brewers), second in stolen bases with 138 (62 fewer than the N.Y. Mets – although it is worth pointing out that they did rank first in stolen base percentage at 88%, better than the Mets 81%), fourth in doubles with 326, first in slugging percentage (.458) and they tied for first in On-Base Percentage with the Rockies.

Undoubtedly Phillies critics will point to the cozy confines of Citizens Bank Ballpark and argue that the Phillies offense only performs well at home. Not true. The 2007 Phillies ranked first in runs scored in away games in the N.L. with 442. The Phillies .442 away slugging percentage was second in the N.L., and their 97 road home runs were third. No Coors Field effect for the Phillies, in contrast to the Colorado Rockies, who scored just 382 runs on the road (good for fifth in the N.L.) and who rank tenth in away OPS with .730 to the Phillies .793 away OPS … Although to be fair, the Rockies played three times as many games at Petco Park in 2007 as the Phillies did, so that might have had an effect. Curse baseball’s unbalanced schedule!

We are going to break up the discussions of the individual Phillies into particular areas of the game.


The star of our 2007 Season In Review is the 2007 National League MVP, Jimmy Rollins. I won’t repeat my earlier post about the evolution of J.Roll’s game from free-swinging lead-off hitter who never got on base to the weapon he is today, but it does bear some repeating: basically, for Jimmy Rollins first three years in the big leagues he was a free-swinger who racked up 100+ strikeouts a season. After undergoing some tutelage from contact-hitter extraordinaire Tony Gwynn, J.Roll cut down on the strikeouts and became a much more complete player.


His last four seasons he’s posted 100+ Runs Created. A uniquely dangerous hitter with his speed and power, starting in the second-half of the 2006 season J.Roll became much more dangerous threat by beginning to club home runs with regularity. J.Roll hit 25 home runs in 2006 after hitting a total of 26 in 2004 and 2005 combined. The trend towards power in his stroke is pretty clear when you look at J.Roll’s Isolated Power numbers:



ISO:
2004: .166
2005: .141
2006: .201
2007: .235


The N.L. average for Isolated Power was .157 in 2007, so J.Roll has elevated himself from lead-off guy with average power to a real slugger. Rollins .531 Slugging Percentage ranked third on the Phillies roster in 2007, bested by just Ryan Howard (.584) and Chase Utley (.566). This season he hit 30 home runs and added an astonishing 20 triples, leading the N.L. by eight (the Mets Jose Reyes was second with a distant 12). Empowered to run more, J.Roll took 41 of 47 bases in the field, good enough for fifth in the N.L. J.Roll’s terrific season helped elevate the Phillies offense and enable the Phillies to lead the N.L. in triples and finish second in stolen bases, the two major ‘speed’ categories.

We’ll start with speed … Remember what I noted earlier about the lessons of The Sinister First Baseman and the Oakland A’s Thou Shalt Not Waste Outs. This is a central tenant of sabremetrics and becomes one of the biggest bones of contention with the old school of baseball when discussed with the subject of the stolen base.

The old school of thought on the steal might be accurately summed up as follows: in order to win baseball games, teams must be aggressive, and being aggressive means doing things like sacrifice bunts and stealing bases. Just imagine that image of the grizzled veteran sliding hard into second base, squaring around to bunt his teammate from second base to third. The slide, the dirty uniform, the grit, the sweat, the determination.

That was the popular image of baseball, something of a hold-over from the Dead Ball era when teams did a lot of that – bunting, base-stealing, stretching doubles into triples, etc. – and the old schoolers incorporate that popular image into what they want to see in modern baseball. The philosophy even has a name: Small Ball.

Sabremetricians, in contrast, long-ago came to the conclusion that the Small Ball strategy was a loser. The benefits of the stolen base – an extra base advanced – rarely exceed the risk of losing a baserunner and losing an out. The home run, the Sabremetricians argued, was the most effective way of clearing the bases and scoring runs. Bill James, when discussing Rickey Henderson’s epic 1982 season, which saw Henderson set a major-league record with 130 stolen bases, noted that Henderson had also been caught stealing 42 times. Said James in his 1983 Baseball Abstract: “That’s 42 outs he took away from some Oakland batter … The actual increase in runs scored resulting from Henderson’s base running: 4 1/2 runs. Four and a half goddamn runs, and they want to give him an MVP award for it.”

Baseball Between the Numbers, the book written in 2006 by the staff of Baseballprospectus.com, tagged Rickey Henderson’s running in 1982 as gaining the A’s 22.2 runs, while the times he was caught stealing cost the A’s 20.6 runs, thus netting the A’s an extra 1.6 runs for the season. The “break-even” rate, the rate by which you must be successful for this to be a winning strategy is roughly 73-78%. The value of a stolen base is .1593 runs, the cost of an out trying to steal is .3687 runs.

The old school belief in Small Ball is summed up by Joe Morgan, the Hall of Fame second baseman whose scattershot ramblings drive sabremetricians batty, when he stated about an Oakland A’s playoff defeat: “The A’s lose because they are two-dimensional. They have good pitching and they try to hit home runs. They don’t use speed and don’t try to manufacture runs. They wait for the home run. They are still waiting.” That’s the basic divide between the sabremetrics crowd and the small ballers.

There is no doubt that the Phillies ran more in 2007 then they had in recent memory. In 2007 they attempted 157 steals, 138 of which were successful. (Incidentially, applying the numbers mentioned above to the Phillies, that means that the Phillies added 14.97 runs to their total by running in 2007: (.1593 * 138) + (-.3687 * 19). The Mets, who attempted 246 steals and were successful 200 times, added 14.89 runs to their total by base-stealing.) This was a significant jump over 2006, when they ran just 117 times, 92 of them successful. (Added runs: 5.43.) The influence here comes from new Phillies First Base coach Davey Lopes, a talented base-runner in his own day, who joined the Phillies for the 2007 season and heartily encouraged the Phillies players to run more and show better discipline on the base-paths.

As I noted, J.Roll led the Phillies with 41 stolen bases in 47 attempts. But he wasn’t the Phillies only base-stealing threat. Shane Victorino, the Phillies new centerfielder, took an astonishing 37 of 41 stolen bases. Victorino’s success rate was actually higher than J.Roll’s (90% to 87%). Aaron Rowand stole six of nine bases. Tadahito Iguchi, Chase Utley’s replacement at second base when he was injured, took six of seven bases in limited action. Jayson Werth, the Phillies new full-time rightfielder, took seven of eight in similarly limited action. Chase Utley took nine of ten. Even Carlos Ruiz, the Phillies catcher, took six of seven!

But no discussion of speed and base-stealing would be complete without mentioning the fact that Michael Bourn stole 18 of 19 bases in 2007. I know that I raved about this ad naseum this year, but the performance Bourn put in earlier in the season in San Francisco where he entered the game as a pinch-runner, stolen second, then stole third and scored on a weak grounder by Wes Helms because of his blazing speed, was one of the most astonishing performances I’ve seen recently. The run was a pure manufactured run, made possible only by Bourn’s speed around the bases.

In you are counting, by the way, those numbers mean J.Roll added 4.319 runs to the Phillies offense stealing bases, Victorino added 4.419 runs, and Bourn added 2.498.

Also, for the second consecutive season, the Phillies hit 41 triples. The decline of the triple is an interesting subject in baseball – partly a product of conservative-minded baserunners or the proliferation of slow-footed DH-type sluggers, partly due to the trend towards natural grass and smaller parks – but the Phillies managed to lead the N.L. in them in 2007. Credit here goes almost solely to J.Roll, who hit nearly half of them (20). Utley hit five, Victorino hit another three, Bourn hit three, and Werth hit three. Surprisingly, Greg Dobbs, the Phillies backup infielder / outfielder, hit four. Even more surprisingly, Carlos Ruiz had two triples in 2007. While the Phillies didn’t even come close to leading the majors in triples in 2006 (the Dodgers did with 58), their 41 that season was impressive.

Let me stop and talk a little about Victorino here. What a terrific season he had in 2007: in addition to his 37 steals, Victorino also hit 12 home runs, 23 doubles, 47 RBI and scored 78 runs. Victorino’s .347 OBP was actually a shade better than J.Roll’s .345 … As I noted in my Season in Review series, you have to read Victorino’s accomplishments at the plate in conjunction with what he does in the field, because he might have been one of the best rightfielders in baseball in 2007, throwing out eight runners attempting to advance. The Flyin’ Hawaiian has a nice balance of speed (he hit eight triples in 2006), power at the plate (a respectable .142 ISO), and defense. I’m glad that he’ll be manning centerfield in 2008.

Michael Bourn, who left the Phillies in the Brad Lidge deal, became a favorite of Phillies fans as the season wore on, and many wanted to see Bourn move over into centerfield and succeed J.Roll as the Phillies lead-off hitter. Yes, Michael Bourn was a terrific – bit – player for the Phillies in 2007, but there were a lot of flaws to his game. Defensively, Bourn played 302 innings for the Phillies and never collected an assist, which I find odd. Bourn had little real power at the plate that he did not manufacture with his legs. His isolated power at the plate was a sub-par .101 … Bourn himself had 33 hits in 2007, 26 of which were singles. I’m not sure he’d duplicate his success in 2008, and in any case, his defensive contributions wouldn’t be greater than Victorino’s.

At any rate, here is what Rollins, Bourn and Victorino all contributed to the Phillies lineup in 2007, according to Runs Created per 27 Outs:

RC/27:
J.Roll: 6.25
Bourn: 5.76
Victorino: 4.87

I don’t have the Phillies base-running data yet (Bill James Handbook 2008 is on my bookshelf and I intend to open it up after January 1), but I suspect that the Phillies will have better base-running numbers then they did in 2006, when Ryan Howard and Pat Burrell ranked as two of the worst base-runners in the major leagues. I suspect all of this, the better base-running, the increase in steals, the high success rate in stolen bases, etc., is the product of Lopes counsel and advice to his hitters.

I think the Phillies decision to utilize the stolen base and to be more aggressive on the bases was a good thing. The hatred the sabremetrics community has for the stolen base isn’t unanimity – Bill James, I’ve noticed from reading his Historical Baseball Abstract, has some nice things to say about the stolen base. Check out James comments for 1960’s baseball:


As the [1960’s] commenced, baseball showed promise of opening up into a new generation of exciting, multi-faceted offense. The use of speed as an offensive weapon, which had atrophied for forty years, began to re-emerge late in the fifties …

Many sabremetricians think the stolen base is exciting and want to see more speed in the game, which is running the risk of becoming a game of nine sluggers at the plate smashing 450-foot solo home runs. In the Lords of the Game I think I see an emerging trend away from the power game and back to a more balanced offense that people used to see in the 1970’s. I’m not saying that every team is going to look like the 1980’s St. Louis Cardinals, but I think teams are going to run more because the focus on steroids is going to impact sluggers, and the backlash against Moneyball is going to encourage teams to utilize speed more and more. It looks like the Phillies, with Victorino and J.Roll, are going to be on the cusp of these changes, with two speedy players who like to steal bases and leg doubles into triples. In fact, all throughout the Phillies roster they have a lot of surprisingly fast players, from Jayson Werth to Chase Utley, even to catcher Carlos Ruiz. This is a fast team, and I expect to see the total of 138 stolen bases exceeded in 2008.

The Phillies don’t really practice a lot of small ball, although that changed a little in 2007. The bunt, the sacrifice, is also a component of small ball and the Phillies didn’t do a lot of that in 2007, 65 sacrifice hits – eighth in the N.L. and exactly the league average. The Mets, who led the N.L. in steals, also ranked second in sacrifice hits. The Phillies actually ranked sixteenth in sac hits in 2006, so you are seeing an evolution of the Phillies offense away from the pure home run to a bit more of a mix, but the Phillies have kept their feet in the long-ball camp more.

Let’s move along to clutch hitting … Another of the shibboleths of sabremetrics is that clutch hitting doesn’t exist. Naturally, this is a topic of much consternation amongst baseball people because the idea that some players elevate their game in ‘clutch’ situations is center to their view of the baseball universe. Dick Cramer, a researcher for a pharmaceutical company, utilized his company’s computers to test whether or not clutch hitting was real and came to the conclusion, right around the time that Bill James was publishing his Abstracts, that it did not. This observation is met with much disagreement with the old school baseball people who fervently believe that clutch hitting is a talent, not random luck, and that it is essential to a team’s success.

I think the Phillies refute that conventional wisdom quite nicely:

BA/RISP:
1. Atlanta: .291
2. Chicago: .278
3. Los Angeles: .278
4. NY Mets: .277
5. Colorado: .276
6. St. Louis: .274
7. Pittsburgh: .272
8. San Diego: .271
9. Florida: .268
10. Houston: .267
11. San Francisco: .264
12. Cincinnati: .263
13. Milwaukee: .261
14. Washington: .261
15. Philadelphia: .259
16. Arizona: .249
N.L. Average: .269

I think the Phillies performance is a testament to the essential truth that clutch hitting is over-rated. They were the second-worst clutch-hitting team and yet they managed to led the N.L. in runs scored. The two worst clutch-hitting teams in the National League were two of the league’s four playoff teams. Although, interestingly, I found that the Phillies were the third-best in BA/RISP with 2 outs, hitting .261, where the N.L. average was .249 …

The Phillies success at the plate and lack of ability to drive in clutch runs is hardly new – in 2006 they ranked thirteenth in BA/RISP in the N.L. despite leading the league in runs scored.

Conclusions: hitting well with runners in scoring position is not important!

But let’s see how each of the individual Phillies did here …

BA/RISP:
Werth: .379
Utley: .304
Rowand: .287
Howard: .282
Ruiz: .280
Rollins: .272
Iguchi: .267
Burrell: .258
Dobbs: .245
Victorino: .236
Nunez: .217
Helms: .198

Hitting well with runners in scoring position is something that fluctuates from year-ti-year. E.g., Pat Burrell, who hit .263 BA/RISP in 2004, then hit .313 in 2005, dipped to .222 in 2006, and leveled off to .258 in 2007. It is really something where there is little-to-no consistency from year-in and year-out.

Let’s talk about Chase Utley for a moment … Jimmy Rollins won the 2007 N.L. MVP award because of his terrific hitting, his speed, his power and his defense. He was the key figure in the Phillies playoff push. However, Chase Utley was well on his way to being the 2007 N.L. MVP before his injury mid-summer, which caused him to miss a month of the season. I think Utley will emerge as the favorite to win the award in 2008 because he is so consistently one of the best hitters in baseball. While we are talking about hitting in the clutch, here are Utley’s 2004-2007 BA/RISP stats:

2004: .275
2005: .309
2006: .308
2007: .304

Mind you that Utley didn’t take over as the Phillies regular second baseman until the one-third point of the 2005 season, splitting time with Placido Polanco. Since Utley got the job, he’s been terrific. In 2007, he hit 48 doubles – which tied him for third in the N.L. and was just two behind Matt Holiday, all while missing a month of the season – and 22 Home Runs, 103 RBI, 5 triples, scored 104 runs, had a batting average of .322 and an On-Base Percentage of .410, grounded into just seven double plays all season long (even a great player like Albert Pujols hit into 27 of them in 2007), stole nine of ten bases and posted his third consecutive season with 100+ Runs Created.

Utley is a hitter with innumerable dimensions at the plate. Want power? Check out his Isolated Power stats:

ISO:
2004: .202
2005: .249
2006: .218
2007: .234

What speed? He’s stolen 74 bases in 83 attempts, an 89% success rate, and he’s hit 17 triples in his brief career.

Toughness? He was hit by pitches a whopping 25 times in 2007, more than any other player in the N.L. (second – teammate Aaron Rowand).

Utley is the Phillies most dangerous and effective hitter in 2007, better than J.Roll or Ryan Howard. Check out Runs Created per 27 Outs:

RC/27 (400+ Plate Appearances):
Utley: 7.88
Howard: 7.76
Burrell: 7.02
J.Roll: 6.25
Rowand: 5.88
Victorino: 4.87
Ruiz: 4.27

That’s phenomenal. Add in the fact that Utley is one of the best defensive second basemen in baseball, and you have a really complete player. Despite missing as much time as he did, Utley still managed to tie with J.Roll and Prince Fielder for sixth in Win Shares amongst N.L. players with 28. Utley’s 17 Wins Shares Above Bench player ranked him fifth amongst N.L. players, again without the benefit of a month of the 2007 season. Look how consistently good Utley has been seen through the eyes of Win Shares:

Win Shares / WSAB
2004: 8 / 2
2005: 27 / 15
2006: 28 / 14
2007: 28 / 17

If Chase Utley wins the 2008 MVP award he’ll be the third Phillie in three years to win it, a feat unmatched in the N.L. since Mort Cooper, Stan Musial and Marty Marion did it for the St. Louis Cardinals in 1942-1944. (Roger Maris, Mickey Mantle and Elston Howard did it between 1961-1963 in the American League.) Wouldn’t that be something?

I talked a little about Jayson Werth the other day, so I won’t dwell on his 2007 season too much. For a guy who played only part-time, he did a nice job, with 55 Runs Created in only 304 plate appearances. That’s actually a better Runs Created per 27 Outs number than Utley: 8.11 to 7.88 … I think he’ll do well as the Phillies new rightfielder in 2008.

Moving along … Wes Helms. If anyone deserves the dubious distinction of being the most disappointing Phillie in 2007, Wes Helms might narrowly get the nod over Adam Eaton. Boy did Helms stink in 2007. After rolling up some interesting numbers playing part-time with the Florida Marlins in 2006 (.390 OBP, .246 ISO, 281 BA/RISP), Helms seemed like a good bet to solidify the gaping hole the Phillies have had at third base ever since Scott Rolen left in 2002. Instead, Helms was a major disaster at the plate. How bad was he?

Well, his .198 BA/RISP was the worst on the Phillies roster .... Sort of. His Isolated Power at the plate plunged from .246 to a paltry .122. He walked just 19 times, seeing his OBP plunge 100 points to .297, the worst on the Phillies roster. He grounded into ten double plays despite playing in less than half of the Phillies games. Never a strong defensive player, Helms was an anchor on the Phillies offense. His 2.73 Runs Created per 27 Outs is the worst on the Phillies roster, narrowly out-doing utility infielder Abraham Nunez (2.74 RC/27). Expect to see the Phillies give Helms another chance, but deal for someone come mid-April if he struggles.

Carlos Ruiz. Many Phillies bloggers have long been fans of Ruiz, even while the media fawned over Chris Coste in 2006, Ruiz quietly took over the catching duties that season and established himself as the Phillies catcher of the future. It’s not hard to see why the Phillies have confidence in Ruiz: he’s a steady player (.308 BA/RISP in 2006, .280 in 2007), who has a good eye (just 49 strikeouts to 42 walks in 2006), and delivers some good hits. True, he grounded into a whopping 17 double plays in 2007, but his 4.27 RC/27 is pretty good for a player who has to concentrate on defense. I also think Ruiz has surprising speed: six steals in seven tries and two triples. His six steals ties him for second amongst N.L. catchers.

Power-Hitting … The Gospel of the Three-Run Home Run is something that most sabremetricians preach. The value of the home run is pretty obvious: in one blow you clear the bases and score a lot of runs. I was reading the new book from Baseball Prospectus about pennant races and I came across the section talking about ’51 Giants Manager Leo Durocher and his preference for dynamic, small ball-ish teams over the long-ball oriented Giants that he took over. Clay Davenport writes:

Managers have often preferred the active teams, the dynamic ones, parly because these teams let the manager do something. The only real exception might be Earl Weaver, who preached the doctrine of the three-run homer. The trouble is that you can’t get a really good offense without home runs … [I]t takes a lot of singles, doubles and walks in sequence for a team to score three runs, whereas it takes just two baserunners and a long fly to score three on a home run.

It Ain’t Over ‘Til It’s Over, Pages 267-268. Davenport goes on to note that an analysis of baseball history bears this out: the top 100 dynamic / small ball teams in baseball history scored an average of 711 runs, while the top 100 static / home run-oriented teams in baseball history scored an average of 763 runs. It is easier, more efficient and more successful for teams to rely on the home run rather than the stolen base.

Thank goodness for the Phillies, they’ve got the firepower at the plate to do that. Check out the Phillies adjusted OPS (On-base Percentage Plus Slugging Percentage) (OPS / Lg OPS = Adj. OPS, 100 is average, 100+ is better than average, lower than 100 is worse):

OPS+
1. Philadelphia: 108
2. Colorado: 104
3. Milwaukee: 103
4. Florida: 103
5. N.Y. Mets: 102
6. Atlanta: 102
7. Cincinnati: 102
8. Chicago Cubs: 99
9. St. Louis: 98
10. L.A. Dodgers: 98
11. Houston: 98
12. Arizona: 97
13. Pittsburgh: 97
14. San Diego: 97
15. Washington: 95
16. San Francisco: 94


The Phillies had a pretty powerful offense. A good deal of that was concentrated in their raw power at the plate:

ISO:
1. Milwaukee: .194
2. Philadelphia: .184
3. Florida: .181
4. Cincinnati: .169
5. Arizona: .163
6. Atlanta: .160
7. San Diego: .160
8. Colorado: .157
9. N.Y. Mets: .157
10. Houston: 152
11. Chicago Cubs: .151
12. Pittsburgh: .148
13. Washington: .134
14. San Francisco: .133
15. L.A. Dodgers: .131
16. St. Louis: .131

Who were the Phillies big poppers? Well…

ISO:
Howard: .316
Burrell: .246
Rollins: .235
Utley: .234
Rowand: .206
Dobbs: .179
Barajas: .164
Werth: .161
Victorino: .143
Coste: .140
Iguchi: .138
Ruiz: .138
Helms: .121
Bourn: .101
Nunez: .048

I think it is fairly astonishing that the Phillies lineup features five players with an ISO of .200 or better, including the team’s lead-off hitter. With the exception of Victorino, every one of the Phillies 1-6 hitters was a major threat to go yard. In fact, if you look at the N.L. stats for 2007, the Phillies hitters rank 2nd (Howard), 9th (Burrell), 14th (Rollins), 16th (Utley) and 25th (Rowand) in the entire N.L. in ISO. That means that five of the twenty-five most powerful bats were found in red pinstripes in 2007 … By the way, these five players were also all in the top 22 in terms of Runs Created per 27 Outs as well: Utley (2nd), Howard (10th), Burrell (13th), J.Roll (19th) and Rowand (22nd) … Look at the home runs totals: Howard: 47, Rollins & Burrell: 30, Rowand: 27, Utley: 22. The five combined for 156 home runs, 519 RBI, 519 Runs Scored, 183 Doubles, 840 Hits, 367 Walks, and 541 Runs Created. Let’s talk about the focal point of the Phillies offense: Ryan Howard.

Ryan Howard had a career season in 2006, winning the MVP award on his way to clubbing 58 Home Runs, 149 RBI, drawing 108 walks (37 intentional), and having 138 Runs Created. Howard literally powered the Phillies into contention before the strain of being pitched around nearly every game caught up to Howard and the Phillies fell by the wayside. Howard continued to get Barry Bonds treatment in 2007, being intentionally walked 35 times. Still, despite missing several games, Howard managed to hit 47 Home Runs, 136 RBI and have 117 Runs Created. Howard’s .316 ISO was second to just Prince Fielder (.330).

Howard’s bat is powerful. Check out his 2005-2007 ISO totals:

2005: .278
2006: .346
2007: .316
’05 – ’07: .320

Ryan Howard is tailor-made for the Phillies power offense. He’s not a fast guy: one stolen base in his career, which must have been an accident, and three triples. In 2006-2007 he hit 105 Home Runs, but only hit 52 doubles or triples. Howard sits at the plate, milks the count, and makes the pitcher pay when he makes a mistake. His 72 IBB in 1,352 plate appearances in 2006-2007 means that 5% of the time, the opposition intentionally walks Ryan Howard rather than take a chance on pitching to him. That’s astonishing. Chase Utley, as good as he is, has only been intentionally walked eight times in his career.

Howard is a testament to the wisdom of the three-home run strategy. He’s one of the best RBI guys in the league while hitting o.k. with runners in scoring position:

BA/RISP
2005: .241
2006: .256
2007: .282

It’s the long ball and drawing walks. Even without the free passes, Howard is very good at drawing walks. His walks per plate appearance are very good:

BB/PA:
2005: .094
2006: .153
2007: .165

Howard’s .165 BB/PA ranks him third in the N.L. in 2007. If you throw out the IBB’s …

BB/PA - IBB:
2005: .073
2006: .106
2007: .117

That’s still phenomenal. In sum, Howard is a major force in the Phillies offense and one of the finest hitters in baseball. In the N.L., his status as the premiere cleanup hitter is only equaled by Albert Pujols and, perhaps, Prince Fielder. Nobody is more the focal point of a team’s offense than Howard and he carries the load quite well.

Right behind Howard, posting some surprising numbers, is Pat Burrell. I’ve long been a fan of Burrell’s work and a defender of him. Perhaps no member of the Phillies roster gets ripped on more or is the subject of more trade talk and speculation.

Burrell’s sin, quite simply, is that he failed to become the next Mike Schmidt. Since Schmidt retired the Phillies have been eagerly looking for a successor to his mantle of team leader and face of the franchise. Scott Rolen failed to live up to expectations and he was dealt in 2002. Burrell stepped into the breach that season and played phenomenal baseball, hitting 37 home runs, 39 doubles, 116 RBI while hitting .282. Burrell finished the 2002 season with a .262 ISO and when teamed with Jim Thome in 2003 Spring Training people, including Schmidt, speculated that the pair would combine to hit 100 home runs that season. The Phillies inked Burrell to a massive six-year deal that season. 2002, as it turned out, was a season that created unrealistic expectations amongst fans.

Instead, Burrell crashed to earth in 2003, hitting .209, seeing his home run totals crash to just 21, and his RBI’s drop to 64. It was a disaster of a season that haunted Burrell’s career. He struggled to get back into form in 2004, hitting 24 home runs and 84 RBI, but he hadn’t recovered his power stroke. After a .195 ISO in 2003, Burrell climbed back to .199 in 2004.

In 2005, Burrell made his comeback, hitting 32 home runs, 27 doubles and 117 RBI. His ISO climbed back to .223, below his exceptional 2002 season, but an improvement over ’03 – ’04. Burrell hit another 29 home runs and 95 RBI in 2006, but he was emerging as a changed hitter. Injuries depleted his speed. After posting 29 doubles in 2001 – his first full season – and 39 in 2002, he hit another 31 while struggling in 2003, before hitting a paltry 17 in 2004. For the first time, Burrell hit more home runs than doubles. In 2005 he hit just 27 doubles and just 24 in 2006. Removed for defensive replacements often, Burrell was actually benched several times in 2006.

Burrell was evolving, seeing injuries take his speed and defensive abilities away. Burrell became a walks-and-home runs hitter, skilled at getting on base. Burrell drew 99 walks in 2005 and 98 in 2006. In 2007 Burrell out-did himself, drawing a whopping 114 walks. For the first time in his career he nearly achieved a 1:1 walk/strikeout ratio. Pat Burrell’s .191 BB/PA ranks him first amongst N.L. hitters.

Once more Burrell had more home runs than doubles – 30 vs. 26 – and once more he hit 90+ RBI with 97. Despite the limited playing time he posted 96 Runs Created. He may not be the player that the fans thought he would be in 2002, but Burrell has evolved into a brutally tough out. The last four seasons Burrell has seen milking counts for bases on balls. After ranking sixth in the N.L. in pitches per plate appearance in 2004, Burrell has ranked second, first and second in the last three seasons.

That choosey, grinding style helps Burrell pluck out the best pitches to clobber. Look at how his isolated power has rebounded.

ISO:
2002: .262
2003: .195
2004: .199
2005: .223
2006: .244
2007: .246

Burrell is consistently one of the best hitters in baseball. Yes, he might be a liability in the running game and defensively, but Pat Burrell is a major weapon in the Phillies offense and they would be hard-pressed to replace him if he is traded. I expect Burrell to play out this, the last year of his six-year deal that will pay him close to $14 million in 2008, and then leave the Phillies and the N.L. to be a DH in the American League in 2009.

Aaron Rowand is no longer a Phillie but he gave the team a good year in his walk year. As much as Burrell is a hard-nosed guy willing to work the count, Rowand is a free swinger who made a lot of nice choices in 2007. His 27 home runs and 89 RBI, along with a .374 OBP and .206 ISO were major improvements over his atrocious .321 OBP and .163 ISO in 2006.

I’m not sorry to see Rowand go because his defensive reputation is over-stated and he’s too free with his hacks at the plate. I think the San Francisco Giants are going to be bitterly disappointed with the player they are getting. Rowand is too inconsistent a player. He relies on getting hits and not drawing walks to get on base. He runs hot-and-cold in the power game:

ISO
2004: .234 (as White Sox)
2005: .137 (as White Sox)
2006: .163
2007: .206

He’s a free swinger who will struggle to produce runs in a park not nearly as friendly to hitters as Citizens Bank Ballpark. Good luck, Aaron. You’re going to need it.

The Bench … The bench turned in a nice performance in 2007. I’m going to incorporate my discussions of Jayson Werth and Michael Bourn here because they weren’t starters, but they turned in a darn nice jobs and was the Phillies best clutch hitter and base-stealer respectively.

The acquisition of Tadahito Iguchi was an important moment for the Phillies in 2007. When Utley went down a major cog in the Phillies offense was on the DL, but Pat Gillick did a nice job raiding a team that was clearly a seller at the trading deadline and prying away a good player for virtually nothing. Iguchi turned in a nice performance for the Phillies, stealing six of seven bases, hitting ten doubles, posting a .361 OBP and playing some good second base (a 1.000 Fielding Percentage in 265 innings of work!). This was one of Gillick’s best moves.

The Phillies cut ties with Abraham Nunez this off-season and I’m certainly not sorry to see Nunez go. In 2007 his isolated power at the plate (.048) was worse than Adam Eaton’s (.065), Freddy Garcia’s (.059), and J.D. Durbin’s (.053). You can be a light-hitter, but not that light! Additionally, Nunez was terrible with runners in scoring position (.217 BA/RISP in 2007). Offensively, he really wasn’t much of an upgrade from having a pitcher at the plate. His Wins Shares Above Bench have been -4 each of the last two seasons. Offensively, he has a 0.6 Batting Win Share for 2006 & 2007 combined.

Also gone is Rod Barajas, the Phillies catcher who went from being the starter to the backup as Carlos Ruiz proved that he could handle the Phillies pitchers like a veteran. Like Nunez, I never much cared for Barajas. He hit .129 with runners in scoring position, which was actually lower than Wes Helms. (Helms had many more at-bats, so he wins the award for worse clutch hitter.) Barajas had some pop in his bat (.163 ISO) and he got on base (.352 OBP, 21 walks against just 24 strikeouts), but he was a drag on the Phillies offense and his defensive abilities don’t overshadow his offensive limitations.

Finally, we come to Greg Dobbs. Anyone notice what a good job Dobbs did in 2007? He had just 358 plate appearances, but he clubbed ten home runs, twenty doubles and four triples. His .179 ISO was good and he got on base a decent amount (.330 OBP). He was 0 WSAB, but he showed real versatility, playing 418 innings at third base, 97 at first base, 82 in left field, 10 in right field, and 7 at second base. I hope Dobbs gets a chance with the Phillies in 2008, but I suspect he’ll be done.

Alright, that’s the individual players … In the end I think 2007 was a spectacularly successful season for the Phillies, their most successful campaign since 1993 and easily their second-best of the last quarter century. The Phillies erased one of the largest leads in baseball history that late in the season and came out of nowhere to upend the heavily favored Mets. They shook off a terrible start and managed to win their first division title and playoff slot in 14 years. Any way that you slice it, 2007 was a big moment for the Phillies.

Is the fact that they got swept by the Rockies cause for concern? Not at all. Making the playoffs was a victory and there is no disgrace in losing to such a formidable team. The Rockies 2007 might just be the most impressive sustained drive of success in baseball history. The Phillies were a team of destiny whose wave crested too soon. I think we’ll look back in 2007 as being a pivotal moment for the Phillies, a moment where they turned a corner, got a taste for success and decided they liked it.

If you look down the phillies roster you see a bunch of young guys – Carlos Ruiz, Chase Utley and Jimmy Rollins are 28. Ryan Howard is 27. Ryan Madson, Brett Myers and Shane Victorino are 26. Cole Hamels is 23. The team greybeard is Pat Burrell at 30.

This is an absurdly young team that is also a veteran team. They’ve been in pennant races in 2005, 2006 and 2007 and they know what it takes to win and make the post-season. With Myers and Hamels teamed in the rotation and Brad Lidge closing, I think the Phillies pitching will be better in 2008. Remember that the strength of the team going into those final weeks was actually their bullpen, not their offense, which ranked seventh in OPS in September, just .010 off the N.L. average for the month. With Myers, Madson, Romero, Gordon and Geary closing down the opposition, the Phillies would have failed to make the playoffs.

Simply put, this is going to be a team that is going to contend in 2008, in 2009 and 2010. I’m not saying that this is the new golden age for the Phillies, but we might be entering a Silver Age for the team of sustained success, playoff berths and possibly championships. The 2008 N.L. will be wide-open. Remember that the best record in the N.L. in 2007 was just 90-72. The 2008 Phillies can do better than that and their adversaries haven’t made appreciable strides to match the Phillies. The Marlins are a wreck with Willis and Cabrera gone, and the Nationals will remain a substandard team for the foreseeable future. Meanwhile the Braves and Mets have talent and firepower, but they aren’t as deeply talented as the Phillies.

In case you couldn’t tell, this whole series was probably a month or so late. I’ve been busy and probably bit off more than I could chew in writing this. I’m taking a sabbatical until January, then I’ll be back rating the new Phillies (including Geoff Jenkins) and talking a little about 2008. Happy New Year!!!

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,


(1) comments

Monday, November 26, 2007

Notes on Fielding: The Season in Review, 2007 

Defense is baseball's visible poetry and its invisible virtue.

-Thomas Boswell.

Fielding. Glove work. This is the area of baseball that A Citizens Blog likes to pride itself on making its special niche in the Phillies blogging community. Fielding is such a difficult area of the game to evaluate and I like to think that this blog is able to deliver the most insightful and interesting thoughts on fielding that you’ll be able to find on the Phillies anywhere.

I often quote Bill James observation that hitting is a solid (with concrete outcomes you can judge), pitching is a liquid (with results that depend on other factors like fielding and the like) and fielding is a gas that is formless and hard to judge with any particular accuracy. Fielding is hard to figure out and agree on, even amongst expert pundits, and often falls victim to conventional wisdom and to inaccurate observations. How often have you ever heard someone argue about how terrific a fielder is by beginning with: “I saw this one play where he …” This is why Derek Jeter enjoys a largely undeserved reputation for fielding excellence that results in him winning a Gold Glove every season (mercifully save this season) while Joe Morgan prattles on about how terrific he is. The moment Derek Jeter flipped the ball to Jorge Posada in Game Three of the American League Division Series in 2001, his status as a fielder was immortalized by the pundits and fans (“Remember when he flipped the ball to Posada in that playoff game…”) and the conventional wisdom that he’s a great defensive player was born. (By the way, Dave Pinto's Probalistic Model of Range, or PMR, says that Jeter was one of the worst defensive shortstops in baseball in 2007, by the way.)

As a bit of history, it is interesting to note that in the beginnings of baseball, back in the 1860’s and 1870’s, players were valued for their fielding abilities and fielding stats like putouts and “bound catches” (balls caught on one bounce were skill outs) appeared in box scores right next to the hits and runs scored. Players were valued for their ability to convert balls up into play into outs, as much as they were valued for their hitting. Thank goodness for Manny Ramirez that the game has changed somewhat over the last 120 years! Fielding was actually more important than pitching, as the pitcher was basically expected to put the ball into play by hurling the ball over the plate so it was hittable. Since pitchers were given the ability to throw overhand and to strike someone out, the focus of the game shifted from the fielders to the pitching mound as the means to stop the opposition from scoring runs.

Since the late-19th Century fielding has been devalued. Tom Boswell said that fielding is “the cognoscenti corner of baseball, the poorly lighted room in the gallery.” In his book The Sinister First Baseman, a book that heavily influenced the philosophy of the Oakland A’s and General Manager Sandy Alderson in the 1980’s through to today, author Eric Walker argued: “Fielding is dramatically overrated. Most – the vast majority, in fact – of all plays will either be executed by virtually any man at the position or will be unmakeable by anyone.” Branch Rickey said that figuring out how fielding fit into the baseball puzzle was impossible. The temptation to dismiss fielding is there and most teams, until recently, followed that. Of late there has been a renewed focus on fielding thanks to books like The Fielding Bible by John Dewan, new and improved systems for evaluating fielding, and the simple fact that fielding is under-valued by the market forces in baseball. Teams like the A’s and Boston Red Sox exploited market inefficiencies and utilized them to find success. The A’s moved to On-Base-Percentage as opposed to Batting Average as a metric for their hitters because the market ignored OBP. Now teams are finding that improved fielding is a cheap and easy way to squeeze a run or two out of their lineup for the same, or less, than they are paying their players. After all, as George Will asks in Men At Work about the exclusion of Richie Ashburn from the Hall of Fame: “Why is a double denied on defense to much less admirable than a double delivered on offense?” (Page 276.)

For those interested in the early history of baseball and the overall growth of statistics in the game, I refer everyone to the astonishing work that Alan Schwarz did in the book The Numbers Game. It is a must-read for any baseball fan. I’ll list some resources on fielding at the end of this post.

Back to the issue at hand … It is difficult to evaluate fielding, but we have a number of metrics we utilize. Said Schwarz: “[F]ielding is baseball statistics holy grail. Few measures of it have ever carried much meaning.” Well, here are the things we like to look at …

Zone Rating (ZR): This is a stat which measures a player’s defensive ability by measuring the percentage of plays they should have made when the ball is hit into their defensive “zone”. Admittedly, this is a stat that is sometimes left open to subjective opinions.

And …

Range Factor (RF): (Putouts + Assists) * 9 / IP. Developed by Bill James in the early days of sabremetrics, range factor essentially measures how much a player is involved in defensive plays. As James argued in his early work: “If one fielder gets to plays another would miss, shouldn’t the record books reflect that?” The obvious criticism of Range Factor is that a shortstop playing on a team of flyball pitchers will have a lower Range Factor than a shortstop on a team of groundball pitchers or strikeout pitchers. James has an updated version called Relative Range Factor (see, The Fielding Bible, pages 199-209) that deals with this by making it neutral with respect to the number of balls put into play and where they go.

And …

Defense Efficiency Ratio (DER): (Batters Faced – (Hits + Walks + Hit By Pitch + Strikeouts)) / (Batters Faced – (Home Runs, Walks + Hit By Pitch + Strikeouts)) How often fielders convert balls put into play into outs. This is another Bill James stat that can be used to evalute team defense, while range factor evaluates individuals.

Stats we don’t like …

Fielding Percentage (FPct): (Putouts + Assists) / (Putouts + Assists + Errors). How often the player successfully handled the ball. The issue with Fielding Percentage and Errors are that they are, as James once said in the first Baseball Abstract in 1977, “a record of opinions”. They are judgment calls by officials about what should have been done, as opposed to a record of what was done. This is what interests me about fielding: this is where the sabremetrics movement begins intellectually. When James wrote the first Baseball Abstract in ’77, it was his sermon against the Error that was the moment that separated him from everyone else who has written about baseball in the past. So this is really where I like to do work and inform people.

Specifically why are stats like the error and fielding percentage so flawed? Well, I like the way James Click sums up the issue in Chapter 3.2 (“Did Derek Jeter Deserve the Gold Glove?”) of Baseball Between the Numbers:


Commonly used defensive statistics – the building blocks of any metric or measure of performance – are terribly and perhaps irrevocably flawed. The mainstream measure of defensive performance – the error – is a judgment call by the game’s official scorer, who is guided only by his gut and a vague reference in the rules to “ordinary effort.” Most of the time, he is correct … [However] discrepancies are the primary reason that standard defensive statistics cannot be used to determine the quality of defensive performance – the same play on the field can be seen differently by different scorers depending on their
interpretation of the word “ordinary.” A home run is a home run, but an error is not always an error.
Baseball Between the Numbers, page 96.

A little more theory before we move onto facts … There are literally dozens of metrics out there that people have hauled out. Bill James has Fielding Win Shares as a component of his Win Shares system. Clay Davenport at Baseball Prospectus has something called Fielding Runs, Mike Humphries has a system called Defense Regression Analysis, Dave Pinto has Probablistic Model of Range (PMR), etc. There are a number of systems out there that measure different things. I don’t pretend to understand all of the methodology, but I’ll try to bring you call of the facts as I see them.

Alright, so that’s a little of the background. Let’s look at the Phillies. As a team the 2007 Phillies were so-so: as a team their DER was .687, which was .004 below the N.L. average and ranked them tenth of sixteen teams. A factor here is the fact that the Phillies pitchers allowed 20% of the balls put into play to turn into line-drives, a pretty high percentage. This is where pitchers impact their defense, since approximately 75% of line-drives fall in for hits, so if a team allows a lot of line-drives, they’ll hurt their defense.

Dave Pinto’s PMR offers a more sophisticated look at the Phillies defense. According to PMR, the Phillies were the second-best team in the N.L., at .00644 (PMR takes predicted outs and compares them to the teams ‘real’ outs. The team’s ‘real’ DER is compared to the predicted DER and you get a plus or minus number. The Phillies +.00644 was just behind the Cubs +.01137). The best defensive teams in the MLB, by the way, are the Red Sox and Yankees at +.01287 and +.01364 respectively. The two Florida teams were the worst … Marlins: -.01721 and Devil Rays: -.01743
This gives you an idea about how tough it is to evaluate defense. DER says the Phillies were tenth. PMR says the Phillies were the second-best team in the N.L. Let’s look at some more information:

The Phillies allowed 54 unearned runs, slightly under the N.L. average of 60.

Here’s what John Dewan’s Plus / Minus, the system that I rely on the most, has to say:

1. Atlanta: +58
2. Colorado: +58
3. San Diego: +55
4. Chicago: +52
5. NY Mets: +43
6. Arizona: +39
7. SF Giants: +27
8. Phillies: +24
9. Washingon: +15
10. St. Louis: 0
11. LA Dodgers: -4
12. Cincinnati: -32
13. Houtson: -42
14. Milwaukee: -48
15. Pittsburgh: -64
16. Florida: -102

Basically the Phillies were just slightly better than the N.L. average of +5. The numbers change a little when you move to Relative Zone Rating:
Relative Zone Rating:
1. NY Mets: .839
2. Chicago: .838
3. Colorado: .835
4. San Diego: .831
5. SF Giants: .829
6. Washingon: .822
7. LA Dodgers: .819
8. Atlanta: .819
9. St. Louis: .815
10. Arizona: .814
11. Cincinnati: .812
12. Phillies: .808
13. Pittsburgh: .806
14. Houtson: .804
15. Milwaukee: .798
16. Florida: .793

The Phillies shift from eighth to twelfth.

PMR: 2nd
Plus / Minus: 8th
DER: 10th
RZR: 12th

I suspect the truth is somewhere in-between. I think, as a team, the 2007 Phillies were average-to-slightly below average as a team defensively. I think that’s a fair statement. Now let’s look at the individuals. And we’ll start in the Outfield. Generally, the Phillies Outfield was a weakness in the past and continues to be one now. They rank fourteenth in RZR (.860 vs. the N.L. average of .879) amongst N.L. Outfields, although they also were second in the N.L. in getting to balls outside of their zone with 201, to the Braves 224. Let’s start with conventional wisdom.

Conventional wisdom: Aaron Rowand is a great defensive centerfielder.

This makes for a nice starting point. A couple of weeks ago a sabremetrically inclined Phillies fan (perhaps a reader of this blog or another blog) argued in a well-written Letter to the Editor of the Philadelphia Inquirer that the Phillies shouldn’t invest money in re-signing Aaron Rowand because Rowand wasn’t a good defensive centerfielder anymore. (Mind you, this was pre-Golden Glove.) This prompted a pair of angry responses from fans that argued Rowand was a good fielder replete with “I saw him…”-type arguments. Well, that is the conventional wisdom.

Reality: Aaron Rowand was a great defensive centerfielder. No longer. In 2005 Aaron Rowand played centerfield for the Chicago White Sox and played very well. According to John Dewan’s The Fielding Bible (TFB), Rowand was the best of the best that season, posting a Plus / Minus of +30. Dewan noted his TFB scouting report on Rowand that he wasn’t “the fastest or smoothest defensive centerfielder, [but he] more than gets the job done … Rowand plays with reckless abandon … [and] would run through a wall to make a play.” (TFB at 186.) When the Phillies acquired Rowand in the 2005 – 2006 off-season, they no doubt expected Rowand to replicate his performance and improve what was the weak point in the team’s defensive alignment: outfield defense.

In 2005 the Phillies ranked first in John Dewan’s Plus / Minus system in team defense, posting a collective +108, 39 plays better than the Cleveland Indians, the top A.L. team and 58 plays better than the Houston Astros, their nearest competitor in the N.L. The Phillies strength was their +107 in the field, but they rated just +1 in the outfield, the eighteenth-best showing in baseball. The Andruw Jones-led Atlanta Braves were first in outfield Plus / Minus at +50, followed by Rowand and the White Sox at +46. Rowand’s +30 had to improve the weakest part of a strong unit, right?

Instead Rowand has been a major disappointment. Let’s start with Relative Zone Rating:

2007 RZR: N.L. Centerfielders
Andruw Jones (ATL): .921
Carlos Beltran (NYM): .915
Juan Pierre (LAD): .902
Mike Cameron (SD): .894
Chris Young (ARI): .875
Rowand (PHI): .861
Bill Hall (MILW): .846

Mind you, Rowand won a Gold Glove this season despite his stats strongly suggesting that he’s an average to below-average player.

Isolated instance? Just a bad year? Well, check out 2006 RZR stats:

2006 RZR: N.L. Centerfielders
Brady Clark (MILW): .937
Steve Finley (SFG): .935
Juan Pierre (Cubs): .926
Andruw Jones (ATL): .924
Eric Byrnes (ARIZ): .917
Mike Cameron (SD): .911
Carlos Beltran (NYM): .906
Willy Taveras (HOU)): .898
Rowand (PHI): .882
Kenny Lofton (LAD): .870
Ken Griffey, Jr. (CIN): .832

Six of seven that qualified with enough innings of work in 2007. Ninth of eleven in 2006. According to PMR, Phillies Center Fielders ranked eleventh of sixteen N.L. teams in PMR at 99.26 (the ratio figure is arrived at by taking the actual outs and dividing them into the predicted outs, thus arriving at a number. 100 is average. Below 100 is below average, above is above-average). The Mets, with Carlos Beltran patrolling center field, ranked second in the N.L. in PMR at 103.45. Rowand’s 99.27 (he basically played all of the Phillies innings in center, so the team and his individual numbers were basically identical) ranked him behind fellow free agents Andruw Jones (102.76) and Torii Hunter (99.97) and leave little doubt that Rowand was an average-at-best center fielder for the Phillies in 2007.

Close the book on Rowand. As a Phillie, he’s been a bad defensive centerfielder. I think Fielding Win Shares illustrates how much Aaron Rowand’s fielding really contributed to the Phillies in 2007 and how little he really deserved the Gold Glove:

Fielding Win Shares per 1,000 Innings:
Andruw Jones (ATL): 5.57
Carlos Beltran (NYM): 5.32
Chris Young (ARI): 5.38
Mike Cameron (SD): 4.59
Rowand (PHI): 3.71
Juan Pierre (LAD): 3.32
Bill Hall (MILW): 3.13

A word on the Golden Gloves … This is an award of truly dubious distinction, in my opinion, because they are awarded based on observations by the pundits and tend to be given, year-after-year, to the same people. Derek Jeter won the award three consecutive years in a row (2004, 2005 & 2006) despite howls of indignation from the sabremetric community. Rowand’s Gold Glove is pretty much right in line with Jeter’s: flashy plays and conventional wisdom trumping solid numbers.

Let’s move along … Over in Right Field is Shane Victorino. Victorino, the talented Hawaiian native, had a terrific season in 2007 at the plate, hitting twelve home runs, twenty-three doubles and three triples. He had a respectable .347 OBP and stole 37 bases in 41 tries. Victorino was a major weapon for the Phillies at the plate and one of the biggest reasons why the Phillies offense was the best in the N.L. again. Defensively, Victorino is Aaron Rowand’s heir in center now that Michael Bourn has been dealt to the Astros.

Victorino turned in a good performance in 2007, ranking fourth of eight RF’s in zone rating. PMR has a lot of nice things to say about Victorino. Overall, the Phillies rank first, number one, numero uno, in PMR amongst Right Fielders: 110.42. The closest N.L. team to the Phillies (three A.L. teams were #2, #3, and #4) is the Nationals at 102.84. The numbers clearly state that the Phillies were the best team in baseball in right. Victorino turned in a 108.72, second-best in the league, converting 229 outs where he was predicted to make 210.62.

He was also second in the N.L. in assists from right field with ten. Nine fewer than the Braves Jeff Francour. In 814 defensive innings in 2006 (101 in left, 156 in right and 557 in center), Victorino had 11 assists. He’s got an arm and good range. In fact, Phillies notched a lot of assists in 2007. Rowand led the N.L. in assists for centerfielders with 11. The Phillies got 18 assists overall from their rightfielders, which bring up something Bill James notes in his Historical Baseball Abstract: “A bad team will have more outfield assists than a good team.” (Page 357.)

Victorino’s performance in 2007 augers well for his new assignment in centerfield for 2008 (although Werth might get that assignment). As the Phillies centerfielder in 2006 he actually out-performed Rowand: .902 RZR to .882, a 1.000 Fielding Percentage to .986, and six assists, same as Rowand, but in 343 fewer innings of work.

Over in Left Field we have Pat Burrell, possibly the worst defensive leftfielder in baseball. (Yes, worse than Manny Ramirez.) How bad was Burrell in 2007? Well, he ranked tenth of ten leftfielders in RZR at .803, under-performing such defensive disasters as Carlos Lee and Adam Dunn. No leftfielder got to fewer balls outside of his zone than Burrell’s 21. Burrell’s .948 Fielding Percentage is laughably bad, as are his absurd eight fielding errors in 2007. The Phillies don’t pay Pat Burrell to field and it is a darn good thing too, because otherwise the criticism of his fielding would probably rival that of Manny Ramirez’s. According to PMR, Pat Burrell was the worst defensive left fielder in baseball in 2007, bar none. 42nd of 42 left fielders. Burrell’s 88.75 was worse than Manny Ramirez (91.53) or Barry Bonds (93.14).

How bad was Burrell’s fielding? Well, Jayson Werth, who notched 576 innings of glove work for the Phillies, had 1.8 Fielding Win Shares, 0.3 better than Burrell. That’s 1.46 Fielding Win Shares per 1,000 innings for Burrell and 3.12 for Werth. Ouch. Burrell’s defensive struggles are mightily off-set by his fearsome bat, but Burrell is a major defensive liability at this stage of his career.

Michael Bourn, Chris Roberson and Jayson Werth all notched some innings in the field for the Phillies. All three often entered as defensive substitutions for Burrell. Generally all three played well, although there is barely any data to use on Roberson (65 innings), and Bourn played mostly in leftfield (217 of his 302 defensive innings in 2007) and had a robust .896 RZR, which would have ranked him second in the N.L. behind the D-Backs Eric Byrnes.

Werth was the Phillies jack of all trades in 2007, logging 127 innings in left, 446 in right, two in center and an inning at first base. According to PMR, Werth was the best defensive right fielder in 2007, with a 114.32 PMR ratio, getting to 109 outs when projected to get to 95.35. Werth’s .925 RZR in rightfield and .929 in centerfield are both impressive, enough in fact to lead the N.L. in both positions if he qualified, but even more impressive are Werth’s seven assists in rightfield in far fewer innings of work than Victorino. If the Phillies give Werth the rightfield job they’d be getting a talented outfielder and a good bat despite paying him just $850,000 in 2007. In fact, the Phillies new centerfielder and rightfielder made a combined $1.26 million in 2007, about eleven times less than what Pat Burrell made in 2007.

To sum up, the Phillies outfield defense was pretty sorry in 2007. Pat Burrell was terrible, Aaron Rowand was badly over-rated and Victorino was good-but-not-great. The Phillies had solid gloves off the bench in Michael Bourn, Chris Roberson and Jayson Werth, but this was not a strong unit:

Outfielders: FWS 1,000:
Rowand: 3.71
Werth: 3.12
Roberson: 3.07
Victorino: 2.78
Bourn: 2.65
Burrell: 1.46

Let’s move along to the infield … The Phillies infield was better than its outfield in 2007. The Phillies infield RZR was .773, which was also the N.L. average. They ranked eighth in RZR, and the 205 balls outside of their zone that they got to was basically the N.L. average of 199. Pretty average.

Ryan Howard was an average defensive First Baseman in 2007. So too he was in 2006. He was quite good defensively in 2005, actually ranking second in all of baseball behind the Rangers Mark Teixeira in Plus / Minus at +16 to Tiexeira’s +17. This was a major improvement over Jim Thome, who was a collective -13 as a Phillie from 2003 to 2005. Since his Rookie of the Year campaign in 2005, Howard has regressed defensively while his batting abilities have improved.

The 2007 PMR numbers are pretty clear-cut: Phillies first basemen ranked thirteen of sixteen N.L. teams in PMR at first base. Howard’s 95.88 ratio was much worse than Doug Mientkiewicz (118.17, best in the MLB) and Pujols (113.01). Alright, the Phillies don’t pay Howard to execute 6-3, 4-3 and 5-3 put-outs, but Howard is a much inferior player to Albert Pujols, his rival star N.L. first baseman. Pujols has been one of the top three defensive first basemen each of the last three seasons. It is worth noting that Pujols is a much better defensive player when evaluating the two.

Also of note: Howard started just 16 double plays in 2007, 14 fewer than Pujols, and his .991 Fielding Percentage is much lower than Pujol’s .995 or the Colorado Rockies Todd Helton’s .999 …

Over at Second Base, the Phillies are blessed to have the best second basemen in baseball on their roster. Write this down: Chase Utley’s #26 is going to be retired one day along with Mike Schmidt’s #20, Richie Ashburn’s #1, Robin Roberts #36 and Steve Carlton’s #32. He is that good of a player, a unique blend of speed, power and skill. Before he got injured he was well on his way to the 2007 NL MVP award, before teammate and fellow pivot-man Jimmy Rollins took the reins. He's the front-runner for the 2008 MVP, as far as I am concerned.

Utley’s .859 RZR and 53 balls outside of his zone ranked him third in the N.L. in both categories. PMR ranks Utley as the second-best defensive second baseman (105.95) in baseball after the Cincinnati Reds Brandon Phillips (110.38). Utley’s 4.7 Fielding Win Shares actually ranks sixth in the NL amongst second basemen, despite losing nearly 300 innings of work. (Overall, Utley led N.L. Second basemen with 28 Win Shares, seven more than the Pirates Freddy Sanchez. Utley’s 17 Win Shares Above Bench are eight better than Sanchez’s 9 WSAB. Utley was THAT good in 2007.)

Right next to Utley is Jimmy Rollins, the 2007 Gold Glove winner at Shortstop and 2007 National League MVP. Was Jimmy Rollins the best defensive shortstop in the N.L. in 2007? Well, PMR certainly thought he did well, ranking Phillies shortstops third overall in the N.L. in PMR at 102.82. However, there is a compelling case to be made against him, actually. J.Roll also ranked ninth of fourteen shortstops in RZR, ninth overall in Fielding Win Shares, and sixth of thirteen in Range Factor. So nothing makes him stand out amongst NL Shortstops. In fact, Rookie Troy Tulowitski of the Rockies (who should have been Rookie of the Year) was clearly the best shortstop in my opinion, ranking first in Range Factor at 5.39 and fourth in RZR. Compare Tulowitski’s FWS 1,000 to J.Roll’s:

FWS 1,000 Innings:
Tulowitski: 7.92
J.Rollins: 3.47

Ouch. On the other hand, J.Roll also ranked third in Fielding Percentage, third in balls outside of his zone and second in double plays started. So there are a lot of points running in his favor and he had the best season of the Big Three NL East Shortstops (including the Marlins Hanley Ramirez and the Mets Jose Reyes). I look at J.Roll’s Gold Glove as a reward for years of excellent work, sort of like when Hollywood awarded Denzel Washington for Oscar for Training Day, after passing him over for The Hurricane.

Finally, manning the hot corner at Third Base was a hodge-podge collection of players. Originally signed to succeed David Bell, Wes Helms proved ineffectual at the plate and gave way to Abraham Nunez and Greg Dobbs. The Phillies third base situation was so bad they actually gave Russell Branyan five innings of work against the Pittsburgh Pirates in August.

I’ve mentioned this in the past in A Citizens Blog, but when David Bell manned Third Base for the Phillies, they had one of the finest Third Basemen in all of baseball. In 2005, for example, Bell was +24, by far the best in baseball amongst Third Basemen. Overall, his +52 between 2003 and 2005 was the second-best in baseball to Adrian Beltre (+71), and +6 better than Scott Rolen, the man whom he was supposed to replace at Third. Bell could never match Rolen’s prowess with the bat but he did a nice job with the glove. After dealing Bell to the Brewers in late 2006, the Phillies pursued Helms, thinking he’d be a solid replacement for Bell at the plate. He was not.

The Phillies ended up playing Dobbs, Nunez and Helms all at the hot corner and all were equally ineffectual. Overall, Phillies Third Basemen ranked thirteenth in Fielding Percentage. They also ranked eleventh in PMR (97.95). Nunez, the light-hitting utility infielder, did the best, with a .711 RZR. Right behind him was Helms at .702 and Dobbs at .644. Nunez’s 3.27 Range Factor was actually the best in the N.L., so Nunez actually played rather well and will make a team a good defensive specialist in 2008. Here are their Range Factor stats:

Nunez: 3.27
Dobbs: 2.61
Helms: 2.53

According to FWS 1,000, here is the Phillies best defensive third baseman in 2007:

Nunez: 3.18
Dobbs: 1.79
Helms: 1.66
And here is PMR:

Nunez: 99.49
Helms: 96.50
Dobbs: 96.29

Mindful of the fact that Dobbs and Helms got significant innings in other positions and Nunez played pretty much every defensive position in the infield. Dobbs, as a matter of fact, played five of the eight positions in 2007: 1B, 2B, 3B, RF, and LF.

Finally, I ought to mention Tadahito Iguchi. The Phillies decision to snatch Iguchi up from the White Sox after Utley went down for next to nothing was a brilliant move and probably helped to save the Phillies season. (Given how thin the margin for error was at the end, I think that is a fair statement.) Iguchi played very well at second base, with a perfect 1.000 Fielding Percentage and an .818 RZR. In fact, if you go off of FWS 1,000, Iguchi was better than Utley: 4.90 to 4.00. Again, like Nunez, someone is going to have a very good defensive infielder once they sign Iguchi.

Now on to a complicated and thorny issue. The Catcher. How do you evaluate a catcher? There are a number of issues to consider: how often the catcher throws out base-runners, a pitching staff’s ERA with him behind the plate, etc.

How hard is it to be a catcher? Well, according to Bill James Defensive Spectrum, it is the hardest defensive position in baseball:

1B – LF – RF – 3B – CF – 2B – SS – C

Basically, as you move from left to right, the difficulty level increases … Even the sabremetric community has done a poor job trying to develop metrics and an over-all method of evaluating catchers. Tellingly, The Fielding Bible left catching out of the book altogether, a rather glaring omission and telling in that it was the most exhaustive work I can find on the subject and it still couldn’t tackle it.

It’s tough being a catcher, squatting in the dirt in 95 degree heat, wearing protective gear, constantly looking to make sure that the runner on first doesn’t go to second, calling pitches, keeping the pitcher focused on the game. Because of the stresses and demands of the job, few catchers are the focal points of their team’s offenses, and none catch all 162 games in a season. The Dodgers Russell Martin was the most durable of the catchers in the N.L. in 2007, catching 151 games. That’s pretty rare: the Nationals Brian Schneider caught 129 games, the Mets Paul Lo Duca caught 119, etc. The hard, demanding nature of the job tends to wear catchers down and make them into the most blue-collar of the players on the baseball field. That’s probably why movies like Bull Durham and Major League made catchers the featured characters and portrayed them as gruff, savvy everymen who mentored and protected the more vulnerable emotionally pitchers.

The Phillies had three catchers in 2007: Carlos Ruiz, Rod Barajas and Chris Coste. Ruiz and Coste were returnees from 2006, when they both arrived in Philadelphia from Scranton to help replace Mike Lieberthal and Sal Fasano. Lieberthal, the long-time Phillie, was on the D.L. and his career was in decline, while Fasano, a terrible hitter, was causing too much chaos to the Phillies offense to justify continuing on the roster. Ruiz and Coste stunned observers by turning in dynamite performances. Coste, in particular, impressed people with his strength and determination after spending roughly a decade in the minors to make his major league dreams a reality. Ruiz’s skills, however, attracted the attention of the Phillies and he was given the job of being the backup at the start of the season.

The starter and replacement for Lieberthal was expected to be Rod Barajas, the former Texas Ranger. Coste was sent back to Triple-A, this time to the Phillies new affiliate in Ottawa. Ultimately, Ruiz took over the catching duties and Coste returned to Philadelphia, where he ultimately nearly caught as many innings as Barajas (243 to 303). With the Phillies declining an option on Barajas for 2008, it looks likely that Ruiz and Coste will be the Phillies catchers in 2008.

Carlos Ruiz led the Phillies in Fielding Win Shares per 1,000 innings with 7.995, a big improvement over 2006 (4.545). Barajas actually did a little better: 8.25, and Coste brought up the rear at 6.58. What did each do? Well, let’s start with innings and catching ERA:

Innings / CERA:
Ruiz: 913 / 4.51
Barajas: 303 / 5.17
Coste: 243 / 4.93

Now Catchers ERA is a pretty unfair metric to evaluate a catcher because so much of his work depends on whom he’s catching and how they do. Now, as I noted above, there is something of a symbiotic relationship between pitcher and catcher (this is where the grizzled, old catcher gets to be the young pitcher’s psychiatrist and friend on the field in the movies) so the catcher does play a role, but we’ll pretty much ignore that. Barajas, after all, caught many of the Phillies early games when the pitching staff was in chaos.

Let’s deal with base-runners. How did the Phillies catchers do with preventing guys from stealing?

SBA/G / CS%:
Ruiz: 0.75 / 25%
Barajas: 0.53 / 33%
Coste: 0.78 / 29%

Now again, I am wary about reading too much into this. Did Barajas just catch a lot of games where teams didn’t steal? Remember that the Phillies played in the same division as the New York Mets in 2007, the team that led the N.L. in stolen bases by a wide margin, specifically with 246, 89 more than the second-best team, the Phillies. So in one of every nine games, the Phillies faced Jose Reyes and Carlos Beltran trying to steal.

Still, I think we can look at the numbers and come to the conclusion that Barajas was pretty good defensively. Teams didn’t try to run on him and when they did they paid the price.

Ruiz’s 25% is actually the N.L. average, so he didn’t do a bad job either. Certainly Barajas, Coste and Ruiz did better than catchers like the Brewers Johnny Estrada, who caught just 8% of the guys who ran on him, or the Padres Josh Bard, who allowed 94% of base-stealers to succeed and consequently had 1.25 attempted steals per game. Ouch.

There is another metric I like: wild pitches and passed balls per game (WP+PB/G) …

WPPB/G:
Ruiz: 0.32
Barajas: 0.50
Coste: 0.19

Point here for Coste.

Other interesting bits of information … as near as I can tell, Phillies catchers made just two errors in 2007, a pair of throwing errors by Ruiz. Neither Coste nore Barajas made a single error. How impressive is that? Well, Mike Lieberthal made two throwing errors as a member of the Dodgers, but he did so in just 167 innings of work as Russell Martin’s backup. Martin himself made a whopping 14 throwing errors. Lo Duca made 9. The Braves Brian McCann somehow made five fielding errors. Yes, errors are a record of opinions, but there is something to it when you see that the Phillies catchers made so few errors and other teams catchers made so many.

Alright, that’s fielding in a nutshell. Tune in next Monday for Pitching.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


(2) comments

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?